Search
Related Links

 

 

Informative Articles

Ben Franklin Didn't Quite Get it Right
When Ben Franklin said "a penny saved is a penny earned", he didn't quite get it right. Actually, a penny saved is worth more than a penny earned. Do you find this statement shocking? I am about to prove to you that what I'm saying is true. Most...

Going Mobile, Part 1: Wireless Phone Service for Your Home Business
This article may be used freely on your website as long as it remains intact, including author byline and resource box and links. We would appreciate it if you would notify us when it is used: Going Mobile: Wireless Phone Service for Your Home...

Print and Modern thought
The scientific revolution that would later challenge the entrenched "truths" espoused by the Church was also largely a consequence of print technology. The scientific principle of repeatability--the impartial verification of experimental results--...

Surviving Corporate Politics
Opportunities Are Made, Not Created In the business of corporate politics, one thing has become very clear: Most business decisions are grown from the grassroots level. Sure, it may all seem likes it’s coming from corporate HQ, with...

What She's Got: Five Essential Traits of Web Wonder Women
Businesswomen, especially those women who own their own web based businesses, possess characteristics that help them succeed, sometimes despite long odds. Lynne Klippel spent the last year interviewing twenty- six of the internet's most successful...

 
The Sickly State of Public Hospitals

There are many types of hospitals but the most well known are the Public Hospitals. What sets them apart is that they provide services to the indigent (people without means) and to minorities.

Historically, public hospitals started as correction and welfare centres. They were poorhouses run by the church and attached to medical schools. A full cycle ensued: communities established their own hospitals which were later taken over by regional authorities and governments - only to be returned to the management of communities nowadays. Between 1978 and 1995 a 25% decline ensued in the number of public hospitals and those remaining were transformed to small, rural facilities.

In the USA, less than one third of the hospitals are in cities and only 15% had more than 200 beds. The 100 largest hospitals averaged 581 beds.

A debate rages in the West: should healthcare be completely privatized - or should a segment of it be left in public hands?

Public hospitals are in dire financial straits. 65% of the patients do not pay for medical services received by them. The public hospitals have a legal obligation to treat all. Some patients are insured by national medical insurance plans (such as Medicare/Medicaid in the USA, NHS in Britain). Others are insured by community plans.

The other problem is that this kind of patients consumes less or non profitable services. The service mix is flawed: trauma care, drugs, HIV and obstetrics treatments are prevalent - long, patently loss making services.

The more lucrative ones are tackled by private healthcare providers: hi tech and specialized services (cardiac surgery, diagnostic imagery).

Public hospitals are forced to provide "culturally competent care": social services, child welfare. These are money losing operations from which private facilities can abstain. Based on research, we can safely say that private, for profit hospitals, discriminate against publicly insured patients. They prefer young, growing, families and healthier patients. The latter gravitate out of the public system, leaving it to become an enclave of poor, chronically sick patients.

This, in turn, makes it difficult for the public system to attract human and financial resources. It is becoming more and more destitute.

Poor people are poor voters and they make for very little political power.

Public hospitals operate in an hostile environment: budget reductions, the rapid proliferation of competing healthcare alternatives with a much better image and the fashion of privatization (even of safety net institutions).

Public hospitals are heavily dependent on state funding. Governments foot the bulk of the healthcare bill. Public and private healthcare providers pursue this money. In the USA, potential consumers organized themselves in Healthcare Maintenance Organizations (HMOs). The HMO negotiates with providers (=hospitals, clinics, pharmacies) to obtain volume discounts and the best rates through negotiations. Public hospitals - underfunded as they are - are not in the position to offer them what they want. So, they lose patients to private hospitals.

But public hospitals are also to blame for their situation.

They have not implemented standards of accountability. They make no routine statistical measurements of their effectiveness and productivity: wait times, financial reporting and the extent of network development. As even governments are transformed from "dumb providers" to "smart purchasers", public hospitals must reconfigure, change ownership (privatize, lease their facilities long term), or perish. Currently, these institutions are (often unjustly) charged with faulty financial management (the fees charged for their services are unrealistically low), substandard, inefficient care, heavy labour unionization, bloated bureaucracy and no incentives to improve performance and productivity. No wonder there is talk about abolishing the "brick and mortar" infrastructure (=closing the public hospitals) and replacing it with a virtual one (=geographically portable medical insurance).

To be sure, there are counterarguments:

The private sector is unwilling and unable to absorb the load of patients of the public sector. It is not legally obligated to do so and the marketing arms of the various HMOs are interested mainly in the healthiest patients.

These discriminatory practices wreaked havoc and chaos (not to mention corruption and irregularities) on the communities that phased out the public hospitals - and phased in the private ones.

True enough, governments perform poorly as cost conscious purchasers of medical services. It is also true that they lack the resources to reach a substantial segment of the uninsured (through subsidized expansions of insurance plans).

40,000,000 people in the USA have no medical insurance - and a million more are added annually. But, there is no data to support the contention that public hospitals provide inferior care at a higher cost - and, indisputably, they possess unique experience in caring for low income populations (both medically and socially).

So, in the absence of facts, the arguments really boil down to philosophy. Is healthcare a fundamental human right - or is it a commodity to be subjected to the invisible hand of the marketplace? Should prices serve as the mechanism of optimal allocation of healthcare resources - or are there other, less quantifiable, parameters to consider?

Whatever the philosophical predilection, a reform is a must. It should include the following elements:

Public hospitals should be governed by healthcare management experts who will emphasize clinical and fiscal considerations over political ones. This should be coupled with the vesting of authority with hospitals, taking it back from local government. Hospitals could be organized as (public benefit) corporations with enhanced autonomy to avoid today's debilitating dual effects: politics and bureaucracy. They could organize themselves as Not for Profit Organizations with independent, self perpetuating boards of directors.

But all this can come about only with increased public accountability and with clear measuring, using clear quantitative criteria, of the use of funds dedicated to the public missions of public hospitals. Hospitals could start by revamping their compensation structures to increase both pay and financial incentives to the staff.

Current one-fits-all compensation systems deter talented people. Pay must be linked to objectively measured criteria. The Hospital's top management should receive a bonus when the hospital is accredited by the state, when wait times are improved, when disrollment rates go down and when more services are provided.

To implement this (mainly mental) revolution, the management of public hospitals should be trained to use rigorous financial controls, to improve customer service, to re-engineer processes and to negotiate agreements and commercial transactions.

The staff must be employed through written employment contracts with clear severance provisions that will allow the management to take commercial risks.

Clear goals must be defined and met. Public hospitals must improve continuity of care, expand primary care capacity, reduce lengths of stay (=increase turnaround) and meet budgetary constraints imposed both by the state and by patient groups or their insurance companies.

All this cannot be achieved without the full collaboration of the physicians employed by the hospitals. Hospitals in the USA form business joint ventures with their own physicians (PHO - Physicians Hospital Organizations). They benefit together from the implementation of reforms and by the increase of productivity. It is estimated that productivity today is 40% less in the public sector than in the private one. This is a dubious estimate: the patient populations are different (sicker people in the public sector). But even if the figure is incorrect - the essence is: public hospitals are less efficient.

They are less efficient because of archaic scheduling of patient-doctor appointments, laboratory tests and surgeries, because of obsolete or non-existent information systems, because of long turnaround times and because of redundant lab tests and medical procedures. The support - which exists in private hospitals - from other (clinical and nonclinical) personnel is absent because of impossibly complex labour rules and job descriptions imposed by the unions. Most of the doctors have split loyalties between the medical schools in which they teach and the various hospital affiliates. They would tend to neglect the voluntary affiliates and contribute more to the prestigious ones. Public hospitals would, therefore, be well advised to hire new staff, not from medical schools, share risks with its physicians through joint ventures, sign contracts with pay based on productivity and put physicians in the governing boards. In general, the hospitals must shrink and re-engineer the workforce. About half the budget is normally spent on labour costs in private hospitals - and more than 70% in public ones. It is no good to reduce the workforce through natural attrition, mass layoffs, or severance incentives. These are "blind", nondiscriminating measures which affect the quality of the care provided by the hospital. When compounded by work rules, seniority systems, job title structures and skewed grievance procedures - the situation can get completely out of hand.

The government must contribute its part. Public hospitals cannot comply or compete with the demands of national, publicly traded HMOs with political clout and the capacity to raise capital to finance hyper-sophisticated marketing. Public policy must be written to support "safety net" institutions. They must be allowed to organize their own MCOs (Managed Care Organizations of patients), to insure patients and to market their services


directly to groups of potential consumers. This way they will save the 20% commission that they are paying HMOs currently. If they become more efficient and reduce utilization, they will absorb the full benefits, instead of ceding them to contracting groups of patients and insurance companies or even to the government's medical insurance plans. The hospitals will thus be able to construct their own networks of suppliers and share their risks with their physicians or with the insurance companies as best suits their objectives.

An example: a Public Hospital with its own healthcare plan is likely to make use of all its specialists and facilities, increase capacity utilization and profits - whereas today only its primary care, less lucrative, services are used by independent HMOs.

The government can limit the total number of healthcare plans available, so that the one propagated by the public hospital will stand out and not be swamped by hundreds of other plans. Such a public hospital plan could also be declared the "healthcare plan of default" - anyone who has not selected a plan will be automatically referred to and included in the public hospital plan.

Not every hospital can start an HMO plan. Only the big ones can support the necessary insurance payments, the reserve requirements and the marketing and administrative costs. The paradox is that big public hospitals are already committed to HMOs, insurers, other patient groups, or government-sponsored MCOs. These resist the inclusion of hospitals which own competing healthcare plans - in their networks. This is natural: a hospital with a plan - is a direct competitor of a private provider of healthcare management and insurance. Another obstacle is that governments are very reluctant to encourage the public sector on account of the private one. This is definitely out of fashion nowadays.

So, an alternative strategy looks more viable:

Public hospitals can act as direct contracting networks. They can team up, pool their resources, exercise political lobbying, relegate administrative and audit functions (data processing, claim processing, payment system, accounting, legal services) to a common centre. This will eliminate the need for middlemen like the HMOs. These joint networks will be able to negotiate contracts with other contractors: physicians, pharmacies, specialized laboratories and so on. This will assist the public hospitals to preserve a loyal and stable (low churning) patient base.

Finally, public hospitals are large employers with political muscle. All they lack is the will to exercise it. They should do it to force governments to adopt some unpopular decisions: offer incentives to HMOs which will refer patients to public hospitals, require HMOs to use all the range of services (both primary and speciality), compensate public hospitals directly for nonpaying patients.

But the public hospitals must begin to behave as public entities: they must open their decision making processes and make them community-oriented. They must shift from relying on contractual language to relying on administrative law (regulations) - except when it comes to employment. In a nutshell: they should be business oriented, on the one hand - and publicly accountable on the other.

There is the little matter of Public Relations and advocacy. Public Hospitals have a terrible image and they are doing very little to change it. They do not even collaborate with researchers trying to establish a factual fundament concerning "safety net medical and social care". In a world where images count more than realities this may well be the public hospitals biggest mistake.

Eight Ways to Improve the Operation of Public Hospitals

A public hospital can lease physical space or temporal slots, or computer equipment or any other equipment which suffers capacity underutilisation - to their physicians for private practice.

The lessee physicians will undertake to pay the hospital - either in the form of fixed fees or in the form of participation in the income (franchise arrangements).

They will also commit themselves to provide community-oriented, non profit services in return for the right to use what is, essentially, community property.

Another method of using the excess capacity is to sell it, rent it, or lease it to entrepreneurs who are not members of the hospital staff. There are many such possibilities: small laboratories, speciality medical services, primary care and specialist practitioners. All these would love to use the superior infrastructure of the hospital. The right to use this infrastructure can be given in the form of a concession, a franchise, a rental arrangement, or any other arm's length mode of collaboration. Professionals are likely to jump on the bandwagon when they realize that the hospital provides them with a "captive market" of patient. This is very much like the relationship between an "anchor" in a shopping mall and the small retail shops surrounding it. The small shops benefit from the business diverted in their direction from the big "anchor" outlets.

The next logical step would be to sell products and services to the community on a commercial, competitive basis. The hospital does not have to limit itself to the sale of medical goods and services. It can also sell medical legal services, use its print shop to offer print jobs, organize its social services as a profit centre and sell them to the community or to individuals, offer medical consultancy on a fee per service basis, even sell food from the hospital kitchen through a catering service or data to researchers from its archives. A natural extension of this approach would be "internal privatization".

A hospital is a collection of small (to medium) size businesses operating under one organizational roof. Laundry, cleaning, kitchen, the provision of television sets and telephones to patients, a business centre for the hospitalized businessmen - these are all profit or loss generating centres.

Internal privatization entails the transformation of the hospital into a holding company. This holding company will own and operate a host of corporations. Each corporation will constitute a separate contractor which will provide the hospital with a service or a product. Thus, all laundry will be done by a corporation which will charge the hospital for its services. The same will go for the kitchen, the printshop, the legal services and so on. These corporations will employ the former staff of the hospital. This way, the knowledge and experience accumulated within the hospital will not be lost. The corporations owned by the former employees will have a "right of first refusal" in the first five years following the transformation. The employee-owned corporations will be allowed to match the best offers in yearly tenders that the hospital will conduct for the services that they are offering.

These corporations will also be allowed to offer their services to other clients. Thus, they will reduce their dependence on one employer, the hospital. They will become truly entrepreneurial entities, competing for profits in a market environment.

A part of the re-engineering process is to determine which of the functions that the hospital fulfils are "core functions", indispensable functions without which the hospital will cease to exist or will change its identity to such an extent that it will no longer will be recognizable as a hospital. All other, "noncore", functions should be tendered out (a concept called "outsourcing"). They should be awarded in a tender to the most competitive bidders, regardless of their identity and previous allegiance. The hospital is likely to benefit from the transfer of functions, in which it has no relative competitive advantage, to outsiders whose expertise these functions are. This is somewhat akin to international (free) trade, where each nation optimizes its resources and passes the (beneficial) results of this optimization process to its trading partners.

To control this kind of transformation, medical information management systems need to be introduced. Many are available and they improve both the quality and the quantity of data available to the management of the hospital and, as a result, the decision making process. This will make it easier for the management to pinpoint which areas require doing what. For instance: the management of the hospital will be able to determine what kind of incentives should be provided to which members of the staff, where could costs be cut and where and how could productivity be improved.

Finally, a novel concept is emerging. Universities and hospitals are two important repositories of human knowledge and experience. Virtually every hospital somehow collaborates with an academic institution, or with a medical school.

There is symbiosis between hospital and medical and social researchers.

Hospitals should actively encourage this. It improves their image, it contributes to their ability to provide quality services. But should not do it for free. They should be contractual partners to the commercial exploitation of the results of research conducted within their premises or with their co-operation. There is a vast field for pharmaceutical, medical, genetic and bioengineering research - and a lot of opportunities to make money for the benefit of the entire community. By not getting commercially involved - hospitals give up money which really is not theirs to give up.

About The Author

Sam Vaknin is the author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited" and "After the Rain - How the West Lost the East". He is a columnist in "Central Europe Review", United Press International (UPI) and ebookweb.org and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory, Suite101 and searcheurope.com. Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.


His web site: http://samvak.tripod.com



 

 

 

Content Menu
  • 10 reasons to start a home business

  • 10 things you will like about a home based business

  • 18 caveats on how not to change

  • 5 common free agent myths

  • achievers interview with david showalter

  • adam smith the real life grinch who stole christmas and won

  • advance your nursing career work as an independent nurse contractor

  • all aboardeveryone going global

  • alternative retirement income options in 2005

  • and you can quote me

  • an honest look at your business

  • audio marketing comes of age educate first and sales will follow

  • avoid the three biggest financial pitfalls

  • a hitchhikers guide to the internet

  • balancing your priorities with your search for at home work

  • basics about writing a business plan

  • beginners guide to blogging

  • being other focused

  • benefits of using freelance consultants trainers for your projects

  • ben franklin didnt quite get it right

  • ben franklin didn t quite get it right

  • beyond budgeting a new approach to annual budgets

  • be a pest make money

  • biweekly mortgage

  • blogging for business

  • blogosphere networking

  • book summary nice girls dont get the corner office 101

  • bridging the gap dont forget your core customers

  • bridging the gap don t forget your core customers

  • building better teams through executive coaching

  • business like image

  • business planning myopia

  • business plan basics

  • can nurses be entrepreneurs

  • career management in a jobless economy

  • change or reinforce

  • christian business opportunities bring relief to your daily routine

  • coaching generation x

  • computer business opportunity provide huge profit potential

  • could a roth ira be better than a 401 k

  • creative strategies for brainstorming for business success

  • crm

  • dance on your brain tonight for a better tomorrow

  • decisions how close are you to a 100 strike rate

  • dej… vu all over again and again

  • dont fall for email scams

  • downtown san diego condo market is ideal for investors

  • do you have the global entrepreneurial spirit

  • entrepreneur runs list sales company from office in his home

  • eq at the office

  • executive coaching and the american president

  • factors to make or break your home business and home business residual income streams that work

  • filling the data leaks the importance of digital asset protection

  • finding the purpose in online networking groups

  • five questions to ask yourself before launching a new business

  • five questions to ask yourself before starting a new business

  • forex trading

  • freelancers your job away from job

  • fun with credit cards

  • going against the conventional investment wisdom

  • going mobile part 1 wireless phone service for your home business

  • going mobile part 2 how to get in on the wireless revolution without credit checks or 2 year commitments

  • going mobile part 3 finding the perfect wireless phone

  • good first impressions count when you mean business

  • good news in our brave new world

  • google slavery old habits die hard

  • hey that was my idea corporate games for a rainy day

  • home business

  • home business solutions 60 minute money

  • how corporations can use real estate to access untapped capital

  • how to get a visa mastercard with no credit check

  • how to get that promotion

  • how to increase your chance of promotion at work

  • how to make money working from home

  • how to share your home office with a sick child

  • how to use an hr consultant

  • how to use emotion in stock trading

  • how your new years eve bash can grow your career

  • important considerations when setting up a profitable home business and a handful of work from home income streams that are quick simple to set up

  • independent rn contractors are taking the nursing profession

  • index

  • innovative entrepreneur ideas

  • investors look for the real estate sweet spots

  • is it boys vs girls on the internet

  • is there any money left in currency trading

  • is the medicalcare system still a disaster in us

  • its high time for lifetime savings accounts

  • know your career goals

  • leadership by persuasion four steps to success

  • learn the art of dynamic leadership

  • life is short love what you do do what you love

  • looking for a change

  • madeline hill senior community pioneer

  • maintaining your motivation

  • make or break home business tips and home based residual incomes that work

  • make your career offshore proof

  • managing project risks part 1 dont be snared by these 6 common traps

  • managing the human resource project

  • marketing your home business in just 30 minutes a week

  • mlm success training why some people become wealthy in network marketing and others dont

  • my identity crisis

  • narcissism in the boardroom

  • narcissism in the boardroom part ii

  • new mobile applications shock market part 1 of 2

  • new years resolutions for your home business

  • new year s resolutions for your home business

  • nine sure fire ways to boost your career

  • no plan no cash back to square one

  • office politics

  • offshore investing leveraging overseas trading

  • oil demand and the effects on the global stock market

  • organizational political savvy

  • paid surveys and focus groups maximize your online income with these tips

  • political selling 101

  • preparing for change during international expansion

  • present like a pro ten ways to wow your audience

  • print and modern thought

  • problogging making money from blogs

  • professional relationship blueprints

  • profiles of the powerful advertising exec steve grasse

  • qualities of a winner

  • reloading the matrix with jada mrs smith that is

  • remember its the world wide web

  • retire debt free

  • rocket investing stock market research advice

  • roi on the 8 step coaching model

  • rotator

  • sales force of the future its not about selling

  • self publishing at the speed of thought

  • sell you with your small talk yes you can

  • several red flags for spotting a phony or scam

  • six of one half a dozen of the other

  • speak with es part 1

  • speak with e s part 1

  • sports betting as an alternative investment

  • succeed the natural way

  • succession planning not on my watch

  • success in the import export business

  • surviving corporate politics

  • surviving corporate politics part 2 keeping up appearances

  • surviving corporate politics part 3

  • talk the talk

  • tax reform my way

  • ten fatal flaws frequently found from the podium

  • theodore roosevelt the original rough rider

  • the advantages of having a home business

  • the benefits of using freelance consultants trainers for your next project

  • the biggest oil opportunity in the world and how you can profit from it

  • the business meeting

  • the fabric of economic trust

  • the fairness of office politics integrity and political motivation

  • the macedonian lottery

  • the musketeer approach

  • the perfect project manager

  • the real story of the little engine that could

  • the sickly state of public hospitals

  • the top 10 brainstorming techniques for business success

  • the top 10 strategies for moving into action and for getting bottom line results

  • the ultimate career builder

  • the wages of science

  • the wages of science part ii

  • think outside the box home business ideas

  • three common deadly mistakes made in job interviews

  • throw out the lifeline

  • time to think outside the box

  • tired of jumping jobs

  • top 10 ways to handle problem co workers

  • top ten brainstorming techniques for business success

  • to get free publicity think local

  • to grow out of unemployment

  • triple the response of your ales letters by harnessing the mysterious power of mind reading

  • trust in a digital economy

  • uncovering soul in the workplace

  • wearing your politics on your sleeve

  • what if peter drucker were your ceo

  • what shes got five essential traits of web wonder women

  • what work at home moms can learn by watching the apprentice

  • when politics prevent innovation

  • when the levee breaks a selfish look at the financial effects of katrina and how many more fuel increases we can take

  • whose goals are they

  • why demo fx account performance is often better than real account performance

  • why dont they just get it done 7 performance tactics for ceos

  • why is it more profitable for an indian to take up work at home business

  • why the internet is an entrepreneurs dream

  • why would anyone hold a bad meeting

  • why would anyone want to hold a bad meeting

  • winning the credit game

  • work from home office policies

  • worse than tsunami trade protectionism hurts third world citizens

  • youre the boss